Table 1 Comparison of the parameter outcomes that the CS algorithm provided with those of other SDM algorithms
| Â | \({\text{CS}}\) | \({\text{CPSO}}\) (Burden & Faires, 2010) | \({\text{GA}}\) (Huang et al., 2011) | \({\text{PS}}\) (Joseph et al., 2001) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
\(I_{{{\text{PV}}}}\) | 0.7607 | 0.761 | 0.7612 | 0.7615 |
\(I_{{\text{O}}}\) | 3.25E−07 | 4.10E−07 | 8.19E−07 | 9.88E−07 |
\(n\) | 1.4814 | 1.5103 | 1.581 | 1.621 |
\(R_{{\text{S}}}\) | 0.0365 | 0.0356 | 0.0289 | 0.0314 |
\(R_{{\text{P}}}\) | 53.618 | 59.112 | 42.368 | 61.16 |
\({\text{RMSE}}\) | 0.0011 | 0.00141 | 0.0192 | 0.0145 |