Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Pairwise comparison of errors with respect to each criterion in wind farm cluster

From: Reasons for wind turbine generator failures: a multi-criteria approach for sustainable power production

Error group OSFE TMFE RSRE DBTE FGSE Weight
Impact of error removal on adoption of technology (IETP)
OSFE 1 1 1.17 2.22 5.88 0.300
TMFE 1 1 0.74 0.65 1.03 0.170
RSRE 0.85 1.35 1 4.00 3.57 0.300
DBTE 0.45 1.52 0.25 1 0.78 0.127
FGSE 0.17 0.97 0.28 1.28 1 0.103
Financial difficulty in error removal (FDER)
OSFE 1 4 5.88 7.14 833 0.550
TMFE 0.25 1 2.22 1.28 5.56 0.170
RSRE 0.17 0.45 1 1.53 7.14 0.130
DBTE 0.14 0.78 0.65 1 7.69 0.120
FGSE 0.12 0.18 0.14 0.13 1 0.030
Impact of error removal on techno-economic performance (IETP)
OSFE 1 3.84 1.92 0.99 3.84 0.340
TMFE 0.26 1 2.94 1.00 5.55 0.240
RSRE 0.52 0.34 1 0.67 1.92 0.130
DBTE 1.01 1.00 1.48 1 3.12 0.230
FGSE 0.26 0.18 0.52 0.32 1 0.060
Impact of error removal on socioeconomic benefits (IREB)
OSFE 1 6.25 5.88 1.19 5.88 0.440
TMFE 0.16 1 1.69 0.84 6.66 0.160
RSRE 0.17 0.59 1 0.52 5.26 0.120
DBTE 0.84 1.19 1.89 1 7.14 0.240
FGSE 0.17 0.15 0.19 0.14 1 0.040
Composite weight of the errors
Error group TETP FDER TETP TREB Composite weight Rank
OSFE (030) (0.09) + (055) (0.16) + (034) (050) + (0.44) (025) 0.40 1
TMFE (0.17) (0.09) + (0.17) (0.16) + (024) (050) + (0.16) (025) 0.20 3
RSRE (030) (0.09) + (0.13) (0.16) + (0.13) (050) + (0.12) (025) 0.14 4
DBTE (0.13) (0.09) + 0.12) (0.16) + (0.23) (050) + (0.24) (025) 0.21 2
FGSE (0.10) (0.09) + (0.03) (0.16) + (0.06) (0.50) + (0.04) (0.25) 0.05 5